Indirect Defenses of Speciesism Make No Sense - Sciences de la vie - Ethique Access content directly
Journal Articles Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Year : 2024

Indirect Defenses of Speciesism Make No Sense

Abstract

Animal ethicists often distinguish between direct and indirect defenses of speciesism, where the former appeal to species membership and the latter invoke other features that are simply associated with it. The main extant charge against indirect defenses rests on the empirical claim that any feature other than membership in our species is either absent in some humans or present in some nonhumans. This paper challenges indirect defenses with a new argument, which presupposes no such empirical claim. Instead, the argument from discordance resorts to the following principle: a certain feature can only justify discriminating on the basis of that feature.

Domains

Philosophy Ethics
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
islandora_170816.pdf (196.58 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Publication funded by an institution

Dates and versions

hal-04567047 , version 1 (02-05-2024)

Identifiers

Cite

Francois Jaquet. Indirect Defenses of Speciesism Make No Sense. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, inPress, ⟨10.1111/papq.12459⟩. ⟨hal-04567047⟩
0 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More